When fans organize to protest the actions of their teams or club owners, this is a clear example of fan activism. These groups demonstrate the power of Jenkins’s theory that fandom provides the opportunity for people to invest in media with the potential to mobilize civic or political action.
In this case, the protest was against Sevilla’s president and board. The protest was aimed at urging the board to remove president Jose Maria del Nido Carrasco and other top members of the club’s management, who the fans believe are making poor decisions for the team. The fans’ protest was successful; the club did end up firing Carrasco and several other board members.
While many scholars argue that fan activism is a fad, recent events have shown that this movement can be a powerful force in the game. Fans have brought down Jose Mourinho at Manchester United and led marches against their club’s ownership at Chelsea, as well as pushed back on plans to commercialize the game in Liverpool.
The NFL’s response to the Kaepernick controversy also illustrates how fan activism can influence the discourse around a issue. Rather than viewing the player’s position as a social justice issue, the statements by various NFL personnel emphasized the importance of patriotism. These officials were worried about the possibility of disapproval from President Trump and losing revenue, but they failed to recognize that Kaepernick’s stance on police reform was a valid social justice issue.